Curve Fitting Problems -Solutions
1.) Given plot of orbital period vs. radius, determine:
A.) Determine the period (in days) and mean orbital radius (in a.u.) of Mercury Mars, and
Jupiter:
Solution: Pick the points off the graph - be careful how you read the logarithmic axes!
Mercury: (88,0.39)
Mars:(690,1.51)
Jupiter:(4200,5.1)
B.) Eros has an orbital period of 1.8 years. Estimate it's mean distance from the Sun:
Solution: 1.8 years = approx. 657.4 days (365.25 days/yr).
Draw a line through the datapoints on the graph. Find where that line crosses 657.4 days (just to the left of Mars). Pick off the corresponding orbital radius: about 1.49a.u.
C.) Determine an appropriate mathematical model for the data represented in this graph:
SOLUTION: The data is plotted on log-log paper, so we need a power fit, i.e the model will be in the form of:
P = Brm
It's shown here plotted in linear form on this paper:
y = mx+b where
y = log(P)
x = log(r), m = m and
b = log(B)
To determine the model, pick 2 points and find the slope using:
m = [(log([y2/y1]))/(log([x2/x1]))]
Using the points for Mercury and Mars:
m = [(log([690/88]))/(log([1.5/0.39]))] = 1.53
To find B, we can merely pick the y-intercept off the graph. But wait - where is the y-intercept on this graph? On a normal graph, the y-axis is at x=0. But here, we are using a logarithmic axis, where x=log(r), so the y-axis is located at wherever log r=0, or where r =1. On this plot, r=1 a.u. lines up with Earth (which makes sense, since 1 a.u. is defined as the distance from Earth to the Sun). So, our intercept B= about 365
So, our final model is:
P = 365r1.53
D.) Neptune is 30.1 a.u. from the sun, what is it's orbital period?
SOLUTION: We'll just plug this value in for the radius in our model above:
Pneptune = 365(30.1)1.53 = 66,757.4 Days
2.) Given the following data:
| T(minutes) | 2 | 9 | 22 | 36 | 41 |
| H(cm) | 125 | 48 | 8 | 0.6 | 0.3 |
A quick sketch of the data shows that it is clearly not linear:

Sticking the above data in ``Best Fit'' I get:
H = 194.3e-.157t , which is in fact exponential. I'll replot this on a semi-log scale to make sure:

SOLUTION: We can find this by plugging t=0 into our model, which returns 194 cm.
C.) When will the barrel be empty? An interesting question. Technically never, since
the exponential curve is approaching 0 asymptotically. So, the question is, how empty is empty?
If we assume 99.9% empty, than means (.001)(194cm) =.194 cm,
H = 194.3e-.157t
LnH = Ln194.3-.157t
t = [(lnH-ln(194.3))/(-.157)] = 44minutes
3.)Bucket rocks, and spring:
Given the following data:
| W(lbs) | 5 | 10 | 25 | 50 | 100 |
| H(meters) | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 0.72 | 0.27 |
My plot make a linear fit look reasonable. I ran it through my calculator for confirmation, and
it agreed. The linear model I got was:
H = 1.22-0.0096w
B.) How many pounds of rocks are required to sound the alarm?
SOLUTION: This is the weight when the height is zero,
0.096w = 1.22
w = 1.22/0.0096 = 127.1 lbs
C.) What is the height when the bucket is empty. Set w=0, you simply get:
H=1.22 meters
4.) Thermal Runaway:
Given the following data:
| Time(s) | 5 | 7.5 | 9 | 10.8 | 13 | 14.3 |
| Temp | 25 | 45 | 60 | 78 | 103 | 119 |
Again we see a curve that gets steadily steeper, so I'm guessing a power fit. My calculator agrees,
T = 2.27t1.49
(where T is temp and t is time)
If 213 degrees is our breakdown point:
log T = log 2.27+1.49log t
log t = [log(213)-log(2.27)]/1.49
log(t) = 1.32
t = 21.07 seconds